Stay Connected

Saturday, 24 September 2016

Grainy Footage Fuels Rumor That Extinct Tasmanian Tiger Lives On

No comments :


The last known confirmed Tasmanian tiger died in 1936 at Hobart zoo, Australia. However, there’s been recurring reported sightings in the wild of this endangered beast ever since.
new video (below) has been released appearing to show the Tasmanian tiger (Thylacinus cynocephalus), also known as a thylacine, roaming around South West Victoria. The grainy footage was said to be filmed at dusk, around 200 meters (660 feet) away from the animal. It follows on from another video (see bottom of page) released earlier this month claiming to show a Tasmanian tiger in a suburban area, rooting around trash cans in a front garden.
Dr Cath Temper, a mammals expert from the South Australian Museum, told the BBC that the latest footage "could really be anything".
She added: “There's never been a thylacine specimen from the mainland. But you never know, it would be arrogant if I said there was no chance."
Nevertheless, the group behind the video remain adamant that small pockets of Tasmanian tiger populations have survived in mainland Australia. Thylacine Awareness Group of Australia argue since this carnivorous marsupial was an apex predator and able to dig burrows, it’s likely it could thrive yet remain untraced in the vast Australian outback.
"Science doesn't want to touch it so it comes down to crazy people spending their own time and money looking for them – such as myself," the group’s founder Neil Waters told the Huffington Post.
"We need solid DNA evidence like hair or scat or sadly a roadkill carcass until they'll even think about it."
Aside from the grainy video footage and hazy eyewitness anecdotes, there’s little-to-no hard evidence around. In 2005, Australian magazine Bulletin and a Tasmanian tour operator put up a reward of AUS $3 million (US $ 2.2 million) for the live capture of a thylacine. The offer fell flat and no evidence at all was brought forward.
For the meantime, it seems like stories of the Tasmanian tiger will have to remain in the realm of rumor and cryptozoology, alongside the Loch Ness Monster, chupacabra, or Bigfoot.

Saturday, 2 January 2016

“If the Christians can have their pope, why can’t we have our caliph?”

No comments :

Straddling two worlds

Worldly, pluralist, hedonistic—and Muslim, too



ORHAN OSMANOGLU cradles a French handkerchief embossed with the letter H. “This is all I have left that’s my great-great-grandfather’s, the caliph’s,” he says. His family has fallen far since those illustrious days. Abdulhamid II lived in a palace, Yildiz, in the heart of Ottoman Istanbul; Orhan lives in a high-rise at the end of an Istanbul bus route. Europe’s royals flocked to caliphal functions, but when Orhan’s daughter married, Turkey’s present rulers stayed away. Worst of all, an Iraqi impostor has stolen the title his family bore for hundreds of years. Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s barbaric outfit, Islamic State (IS), promises to restore the caliphate. Does Mr Baghdadi know what he is talking about?
For 1,300 years the caliphs, or “successors”, prided themselves on developing the Islamic community the Prophet Muhammad left behind. The Ottoman Empire, which rivalled the Roman one in longevity, came to include not only the Middle East, but north Africa, much of the north Black Sea coast, and south-eastern Europe all the way to the gates of Vienna. Ruling from Istanbul, the caliphs kept polyglot courts, reflecting the multiple religions and races represented there. French was a lingua franca at the Ottoman court; Persian, Armenian and Arabic were also spoken.

Far from reading only the Koran and the Muslim Sunnah, Abdulhamid II had a taste for spy novels and Sarah Bernhardt, the greatest actress of her age, whom he brought several times to his private theatre. “In politics Abdulhamid was conservative,” says Suraiya Farooqi, a professor of Ottoman history at Istanbul’s Bilgi University. “In private, his tastes were distinctly Verdi.” The Ottomans paraded in the latest fashions, often imported from Venice. Photographs in the vaults of the old Ottoman Bank show their clerks in pristine English frock-coats. In 1894 the governor of Smyrna, now Izmir, even banned the baggy trousers worn by mountain
zeybeks (militias) because he found them uncouth.The caliphs were far from doctrinaire. Abdulhamid II, who ruled from 1876 to 1909, was one of the more Islamist, but he loved music (forbidden by IS) with a passion. He grew up in a court where the princesses played a piano coated in gold leaf given by Napoleon III, and Layla Hanoum taught the princes the cello. On Thursday evenings he would accompany Sufi masters in reciting the dhikr (rhythmic repetition of the name of God), and his imperial orchestra would play Offenbach on the way back from Friday prayers at the mosque. At state banquets the orchestra would match each course to a different concerto, including some by “Pasha” Giuseppe Donizetti, Gaetano’s older brother, who was the court composer. The last caliph, Abdulmecid II, played the violin, entertaining a mixed audience of men and women at concerts.
In their efforts to emulate other European rulers, the caliphs commissioned Europe’s leading architects to design new palaces. Abdulhamid II’s father, Abdulmecid I, abandoned the Topkapi Palace, perched on the heights overlooking the city, and moved to the Dolmabahce, a neo-baroque edifice with marble steps that were washed by the waves of the Bosporus. Passengers on liners sailing past could glimpse through the windows its crystal balustrades and its chandelier, the world’s largest, made in Birmingham. “The 19th-century caliph projected himself as a European emperor, like the Habsburgs or Romanovs,” says Mehmet Kentel, the head librarian at Koc University’s Research Centre for Anatolian Civilisations. Money was no object: Abdulhamid II’s descendants are seeking to recover a legacy, excluding his estates, that they estimate at $30 billion.
The iconoclasts of IS sledgehammer human likenesses; the last caliphs fashioned them. Abdulhamid II appointed Pierre Désiré Guillemet, a French painter, and his wife to establish the empire’s first arts school, and Fausto Zonaro, an Italian, as his in-house palace painter. Zonaro’s students included Abdulhamid II, whose paintings are still in the Dolmabahce. In “The Pondering” Abdulmecid II painted his wife Sehsuvar reclining, unveiled, reading Goethe’s “Faust” (pictured above). Another of his paintings, “Beethoven in the Harem”, depicts her unveiled again, playing the violin, with a trio that includes one of his Circassian consorts on the piano and a male accompanist on the cello. The setting, again, is continental, with European furnishings and a bust of Beethoven. Neither the orientalist fantasy of the harem nor the zealously segregated purdah of the capital of IS, Raqqa, are anywhere to be seen.
Nor was Western culture confined to the palace. Abdulmecid I hired two Swiss architects, the Fossati brothers, to renovate the Hagia Sophia—the former seat of the Patriarch of Constantinople that became a mosque and is now a museum—installing a gallery for non-Muslims to observe the worshippers below. They designed the country’s first opera house, its first university and new law courts, which are still in use. A Greek architect, Nikolai Kalfa, designed Abdulhamid II’s favourite mosque, Yildiz Hamidiye. So many playhouses, shadow-theatres and concert halls surfaced in the city that “The Encyclopaedia of Istanbul Theatres” fills three volumes. Despite traditional opposition to football, the last caliph’s son, Omer Faruk, was president of Istanbul’s premier team, Fenerbahce, while the city was under British occupation.
Under the 19th-century caliphs Istanbul became a metropolis of modernisation
Under the 19th-century caliphs, Istanbul became “a metropolis of modernisation”, says Philip Mansel in his book, “Constantinople: City of the World’s Desire, 1453-1924”, which spans the five centuries the Ottomans ruled the city. The first official newspaper, Moniteur Ottoman, appeared in 1831, first in French and then in Ottoman Turkish, as well as Greek, Armenian, Persian and Arabic. Abdulhamid II Westernised oriental concepts of time by erecting clocktowers across his empire, often at the entrance to mosques. He furnished Istanbul with an underground metro, the second in Europe. And he introduced the telegraph, an intelligence service and a rail network. The first Oriental Express steamed from Paris to Constantinople in 1889, almost two decades before the Ottomans completed their pilgrimage railway to Medina.
Ottoman attitudes to religiosity could be disarmingly liberal, too. The caliphs maintained multi-tier legal codes for their different communities. From 1839 Abdulmecid I revamped the legal system, introducing secular law alongside sharia. He gave non-Muslims equal rights with Muslims, abolished the right of the sultan to execute members of his court without trial, banned the slave trade and allowed the opening of taverns, which filled with European painters and composers on court stipends. Diplomatic diaries from the time record caliphal scions enjoying a tipple, particularly of drinks that had not existed in the Prophet’s time and were therefore, according to more liberal readings, permitted. Mahmoud II was spotted sipping champagne at society balls.
Enjoying a tipple
Such practices were not aberrations. Drinking was a fundamental part of the pre-Ottoman early medieval caliphal courts, particularly Tamerlane’s, says Hugh Kennedy, a professor of Arabic at London University’s School of Oriental and African Studies, who is writing a book on their wanton ways. The greatest caliph of all, Harun al-Rashid (786-809), presided over an intellectual awakening and oversaw the translation of Greek Sophists in his House of Wisdom in Baghdad, but also partied with his debauched bard, Abu Nawwas, who composed drinking ditties as well as some of the Arab world’s finest classical verse. Drunken dervishes roam “The One Thousand and One Nights”, compiled during his reign.
Occasionally puritans howled. Caliph Walid II was killed in 744 after allegations he had organised drinking parties in Mecca. But dissolution was mostly taken as par for the course. Selim II (1566-75), who conquered Cyprus and Tunisia, died in a drunken stupor, after smashing his head on his Turkish bath.
Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi: less Goethe and champagne
For all that, the caliphs could be profoundly reverential. They saw themselves as defenders of the multiple faiths that sought their protection, not just Islam. When Spain’s Christian rulers expelled their Jews, Bayezid, the then-caliph, sent boats to rescue them. Istanbul was an Armenian and Orthodox capital as well as an Islamic one. (In the Ottoman army, too, Iraqis fought alongside Albanians and Chechens.) Obedience was expected: Abdulhamid II is reputed to have slaughtered 30,000 Armenians to suppress a revolt around Adana, on the north-eastern Mediterranean. But those who proved docile and useful were welcome, whatever their origin. Abdulhamid II’s foreign minister for a quarter-century was Armenian, as were the architect of his palace and the designer, along with Jean-Paul Garnier, of the clocktowers that became his hallmark across the empire.
Sisli’s Darulaceze, the hospice for the homeless Abdulhamid II built in 1896, is easily missed. A highway zips past above the Golden Horn, too fast to catch the golden Arabic herald over the mahogany doors. But for those who pause there, the long courtyard shaded with cypress trees offers not just an escape from modern Istanbul’s frenzy but a time capsule of caliphal values. It contains a mosque to the south, and a church and a synagogue, with stars of David, to the north. Even as Orthodox Christians and Zionists were seeking to slough off Ottoman rule and govern themselves, the caliph was still building them holy places.
Ultimately, of course, the caliphate, along with eastern Europe’s other dynastic empires, the Habsburgs and Romanovs, was dissolved. After the first world war the British and French occupied Istanbul, along with all the caliph’s remaining Arab lands. Turkish nationalists under Mustafa Kemal, an army general, took the Anatolian rump that remained. Had Russia not fallen prey to its own revolution, its army too might have held eastern Anatolia.
By that point, the caliphs were powerless. In 1923 Mustafa Kemal abolished the Ottoman Empire, proclaimed a republic and made himself president. A year later he abolished the title of caliph. Even a titular role was too threatening for the republicans—and for the British, who feared that a Muslim revival in the Middle East might have repercussions for their rule in India. He stripped the imperial family of its Turkish nationality and possessions, took the Dolmabahce for himself and went on to proclaim himself “Ataturk”, father of the Turks.
Turkish history books ridiculed the country’s former leaders as anti-Western, anti-women, tyrannical and obscurantist. The family lived in penury, strewn across the world. Two became taxi-drivers in Beirut; another played the zither in Lebanese nightclubs. Only half a century later, in 1974, did Turkey let the first male relatives back. Mr Osmanoglu returned from Damascus, recovered his Turkish nationality in 1985, and opened an import-export business trading with bits of his forefathers’ former empire. When Hosni Mubarak was toppled in Egypt, thugs broke into the ports and pillaged his containers, leaving him bankrupt.
Recently, under the Islamist-leaning president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey has seemed to relent a little. Textbooks are less derisive. State television sometimes shows interviews with members of the clan. Mr Erdogan is pushing the country to reconnect with its Ottoman past. “Over the last decade people have begun to respect us more,” says Mr Osmanoglu. The day your correspondent met him he had come from Bursa, a four-hour drive away, where he had taken part in the opening of the mausoleum of Murad II, an ancestor who ruled in the 15th century, before the Ottomans had even taken Istanbul. Still, he worries about raising his profile too much, lest Mr Erdogan covet the caliphate for himself. “If the Christians can have their pope, why can’t we have our caliph?” asks the curator of Abdulmecid II’s study in the Dolmabahce.
Mr Osmanoglu has toyed with forming a political party, if only he had the money. The last Ottoman leader stood for election in 1922, he notes, winning office for the first time in six centuries by the people’s formal consent. Perhaps, he says, a little nostalgia for the family and the stability they brought the region remains.
In one of his last paintings, Abdulmecid II depicted a history tutorial. On the table lies a map of Rumelia, today’s Balkans. The tutor covers his face with his hand, too grief-stricken or embarrassed to account for its loss. A ginger-haired girl stares at the map and a boy in a starched collar, cravat and suit points at it, determined to win it back. Beneath the frame, the caliph has added the caution: “Forget those who have caused you personal problems, but don’t forgive the insult to your homeland.”
When Mustafa Kemal dissolved the caliphate, the guards sent to give the household their marching orders are said to have found the caliph in his study beside his easel, perusing volumes of his favourite magazine. It was La Revue des Deux Mondes, exemplifying the Ottoman knack for straddling two worlds that has created such problems ever since. Within 24 hours he had boarded the Orient Express at Stambouli station, heading west to Europe.

Man Fails Paternity Test Because Unborn Twin Is The Biological Father Of His Son

No comments :

Man Fails Paternity Test Because Unborn Twin Is The Biological Father Of His Son

October 26, 2015 | by Justine Alford
photo credit: isak55/Shutterstock
Prepare to have your mind blown. This is the fascinating case study of a man who failed a paternity test because part of his genome actually belongs to his unborn twin. This means that the genetic father of the child is actually the man in question’s brother, who never made it past a few cells in the womb.
Yes, this sounds completely crazy and like a headline you might read in a trashy magazine. But before you write it off as that, let’s go into some more details.
It all starts off with a couple in the U.S. who were having trouble conceiving their second child. They decided to seek help and went to a fertility clinic, where eventually intrauterine insemination was performed. This involves washing and concentrating sperm before inserting it directly into the uterus of a woman around the time of ovulation to boost the chances of fertilization.
The assisted conception worked, and nine months later the happy couple welcomed a baby boy into the world. But then things started to take a turn for the weird. Testing revealed that the child’s blood type didn’t match up with his parents’.
“Both parents are A, but the child is AB,” Barry Starr from the Department of Genetics at Stanford University told IFLScience. “There are rare cases where that can happen, but their first thought was that the clinic had mixed up sperm samples.”
The couple therefore decided to take a standard paternity test, which to their dismay revealed that the man was not the child’s father. So they took another test, but the results were the same. At this point, mixing up samples didn’t seem too far-fetched, but the clinic had only dealt with one other intrauterine insemination at the same time as this couple, which involved an African-American man, and given the child’s appearance this didn’t match up.
This was when Starr was contacted by the couple’s lawyer, who suggested that they take a more powerful test: the over-the-counter 23andMe genetic service. This was because this particular test is good at looking at family relationships. The results that came back were pretty surprising, suggesting that the child’s father was actually his uncle, the man’s brother.
At this point, Starr’s team decided to delve a little deeper, with the idea that the man could possibly be a “human chimera,” i.e. an individual with different genomes. It’s actually not uncommon for multiple fertilizations to happen in the womb even when only one child is born. What can sometimes happen is two independent early embryos, at this stage just clumps of cells, actually fuse together and go on to develop normally as a single individual.
To test this theory, DNA samples were taken from both the cheek of the father, which was used for the original paternity tests, and also his sperm. Once again, the cheek cells didn’t match up with the child, but the sperm sample told a different story.
Supporting the human chimera idea, what they found was a “major” genome, accounting for roughly 90% of the sperm cells, and a “minor” genome that only represented about 10%, Starr explained. The major genome matched up with the cheek cells, but the minor genome was consistent with the child’s DNA.
“So the father is the fusion of two people, both the child’s father and uncle. That’s wicked cool,” said Starr. 

27 Most Psychotic Selfies Ever Taken [18+]

No comments :
Viewer discretion is advised... These selfies are with actual dead bodies!
The recently sparked controversy that has been making head-lines all over the world has to do with the ‘selfie’ taken by a teenage Saudi boy with his grandfather’s dead-body. Moreover, he found it funny enough to stick his tongue out and upload the picture on social media for everyone to see.
2A239C9400000578-3145664-The_shocking_selfie_has_led_to_a_hospital_investigation_into_how-m-47_1435751067267
This is not the first time such utter disregard has been displayed by people, proving not only a lack of morality and humanity but also of dignity and sensitivity that has apparently become the norm among the walking- talking selfie obsessed world. This is not an isolated event that has only happened in one part of the world. Below are some pictures from different social media websites, posted by people from different countries, that show people have become so immune to the suffering of others around them and are so self-indulgent that they wish to promote their ‘inhumanity’ via the internet. Ironically they end up doing so by flaunting whatever good deed they plan on doing – just for the camera.
0aa4tBP
CERWEeKWYAIvqPA
Viewer discretion is advised as below are images of people posing with actual dead bodies.
c9a47ce7a1b97dee0a96710c6a39f24d.600x
84166555
IndiaTvcd9f86_man-clicks-selfie-with-dead-body
selfiegonewrong
y4mt1vtzynxmvmgrsjhq
selfie1
selfies-with-grandpa
84166558

'These People Didn't Die. . . Humanity Did'

What we fail to understand is that sometimes, these are pictures taken by more than 1 person; one who poses and the other that takes the inappropriate picture. It’s tragic just how low we have stooped  as a race that instead of condemning such activity, people actually find it funny and worth sharing ‘just for laughs’ or for attention with utter disregard for other people.
bkchd_big
Kittel_selfie
What we fail to understand is that sometimes, these are pictures taken by more than 1 person; one who poses and the other that takes the inappropriate picture. It’s tragic just how low we have stooped as a race that instead of condemning such activity, people actually find it funny and worth sharing ‘just for laughs’ or for attention with utter disregard for other people.
dead-02
a97767_Photo5
84166551
Sydney-hostage-crisis-selfie
This picture may look like a happy one on a good day, but there are people being held hostage inside that building behind them. And they know that . . .
selfie6
84166547
84166549
a99032_selfie15
So much so, they are willing to go to any lengths even at their own expense. This unhealthy obsession, to maximize the number of ‘likes’, on a picture, is NOT the purpose of humanity. Wake up people. Liking such things is promotion itself and this needs to be condemned. Didn’t all these people deserve a little respect? Maybe just some privacy would have sufficed since clearly, your attention resulted in nothing but negativity.
selfie2
corredor-hace-selfie-corre-encierro_MDSIMA20140711_0023_21
84166559
Making a mockery of other people to derive humor and feel good about yourself is potentially the worst way to depict yourself.
enhanced-buzz-6123-1386863503-5
99a5d5f8e2f3a56c5d1a9bae5c2eccbe1e130b4a
Of course this explains why the more serious issues at hand are only made worse; this is what happens in the Sindh Assembly where serious socio-political issues are discussed in an attempt to come up with solutions to ease the suffering of the people:
Selfie-From-Sindh-Assembly-While-People-Are-Dying-of-Heat-Stroke14326214_2015628154429


 

10 Selfies Taken Moments Before Death

No comments :
Most of us cannot live without social media and enjoy capturing important moments in our lives with a timeless 'selfie'. As mobile users increasingly share images online, tragically they have sometimes snapped the moments leading up to a person's death.

1. Xenia Ignatyeva Fell Off The Bridge While Taking A Selfie

This 17 year old Russian girl, Xenia Ignatyeva, took a selfie from a bridge 28 feet off the ground, to impress her friends. She lost her balance and fell on a cable,that tragically electrocuted her to death.
No-Fear-of-Heights

2. Jenni Rivera Took A Selfie Before The Jet Took Off That Crashed Later

In December 9, 2012, Mexican pop star Jenni Rivera and her entourage of six, took this selfie right before taking off on a private jet which sadly crashed and left no survivors.
Jenni-Rivera

3. Bride-To-Be Met A Fatal Accident While Trying To Take A Selfie With Her Best Friend

These two friends were headed to a bachelorette party when this picture was taken. Not a minute later they met an accident, and Collette Moreno, the bride-to-be, was killed in a head on collision.
two-friends

4. Jadiel Uploaded This Selfie Minutes Before He Died In An Accident

This is a selfie snapped by the famous Puerto Rican musician Jadiel, uploaded to Instagram moments before he had a fatal motorcycle crash in New York in May, 2014.
Rapper-Jadiel-died-in-New-York

5. Gary Slok Uploaded A Selfie Minutes Before The Malaysian Airlines flight MH17 Took Off

Gary and his mother took this selfie minutes before taking off from Amsterdam on Malaysian Airlines flight MH17, which was shot down over Ukraine in July, 2014.
MH17-victims

6. Oscar Otero Aguila Tried Taking A Selfie With A Gun, Lost His Life

21-year old Mexican, Oscar Otero Aguilar, lost his life when he tried to take a selfie with a gun, for his Facebook page in July of 2014.
PAY-Oscar-Otero-Aguilar

7. Karen Hernández Drowned Into A River While Talking A Selfie

This 13-year-old girl named Karen Hernández wanted to take a selfie on the banks of the El Tunal river in Durango, Mexico. Unfortunately she fell into the river and drowned; firefighters recovered her body in July.
84331643

8. An Old Man Got Electrocuted While Trying To Take A Selfie

In March 2014 a 21-year-old man died in Jaén, Spain by electrocution when he climbed to the top of a movie train to take a selfie.
84331644

9. Iranian Women Crashed Into Another Car While Taking A Selfie

These two Iranian women wanted to take a selfie while singing karaoke in the car .They got so engrossed that they stopped watching the road and crashed into another car.
84331645

10. Polish Couple Died While Trying To Take Selfie On The Edge Of A Cliff

A Polish couple on vacation in Portugal tried to take a selfie on the edge of a cliff on August 10, 2014 . . . they both fell to their death. Their death was witnessed by their two kids, 5 and 6 years old respectively, who had accompanied their parents to the Cliff.
84331646